Set in a small Quebec town in the late-1920′s, this emotional drama follows the life and exploits of Celeste Beaumont, a talented young pianist who gains local celebrity at the town movie theater for her gifts as a silent film pianist. Awkward Pierre Blaudell is her biggest fan and eventually marries her. Shortly after this she bears his son, Pierre, who joins the army. She insists on joining him at the base and his meddlesome, snooty parents insist she give them her son. Pierre is killed in the war, and Celeste flees to New York where she finds steady employment as a jazz pianist. She finds a life-long companion with a black musician and chronicles her experiences in a diary that she passes on to her son after he grows up. Her son becomes a painter and once his own son, Antoine, is grown, reads him the story of Celeste, the youth’s grandmother. Intrigued, Antoine heads to the Big Apple in hopes of finding her.
This movie is an emotional drama about how Antoine, played beautifully by François Méthé, discovers the details of his heritage. This film won many awards in Canada and at Cannes in 1988. François Méthé, who was about 11-years-old, never acted again after this movie.
From IMDb:
A quiet painter, separated from his wife for a year, receives a suitcase in the mail from his mother, whom he hasn’t seen since infancy. He believes she abandoned him to his wealthy, paternal grandparents. The suitcase contains mementos and a diary, a long letter to him, written over the years, with details of her youth, her first job as a pianist at a cinema, the coming of talkies, her marriage, and how he came to live with his grandparents. As he reads through the materials and her story comes to life, his son Antoine, who’s about 10 or 12, tries to break through his father’s silence and sorrow by taking matters into his own hands.
Like I expected, WOKE of the year. Man's blue Jesus from Wokeman. Woman's
惊悚元素挺好的，但是主题太直白就拉低档次了。
想拍《黄蜂侠》就直接拍，别打着恐怖片的幌子骗人。
恐怖的candyman在种族歧视面前也成了唯一的守护者。唯一的bug就是男主身上的蜇伤和烫伤是怎么蔓延开的。还有candyman到底是shaman 还是巫师？很多细节都没有交代清楚
NO作NO带，对于科学无法解释的东西，你可以不信，但要保持敬畏，能不碰千万别碰。
还有穿插全篇的皮影画面，很有意思。
喬登皮爾再次用驚悚包裝種族議題，只不過這次講的是更為純粹的黑人血淚史，糖果人是過去被欺凌致死的黑人所產生的傳說形象，有點像黑人的超級英雄，但是更為正確的說法，是黑人的私刑者化身，這種對著鏡子說XXX就會發生什麼事的童謠設定，記得小時候好像也聽過XD，新導演尼亞達柯斯塔超前完成任務，鏡位考究，尤其是鏡像的呈現，執行的非常漂亮，《我們》玩影子，《糖果人》玩鏡子，即便不是喬登皮爾親自執導，尼亞達柯斯塔也拍出了喬登皮爾會拍出的樣子，步入資產化社會已久，自己都忘了自己的出生，即便自己身在異鄉，也仍需知道自己的出生，記得民族的血淚史，最後讓糖果人的傳說持續流傳下去吧，直到美國社會真正平等的一天，期待驚奇隊長2，這位新導演很有潛力
我的意中人是一个盖世尼哥，有一天他会带着一群蜜蜂来救我。系列第一部逃出绝命镇最好，第二部算是隐喻也还不让人生厌，这一部确实是把BLM三个大字糊在观众脸上了，体验可能就因人而异了。贯穿整部电影的剪影加一分。
这部电影整体观感并没有那么差，虽然只给了三颗星，但在IMDB还是给的7分，可以作为导演Nia DaCosta的代表作，电影里不仅是杀死了白人，回忆片段中黑人小孩也有，不管是不是真的，都千万别去试，影片对糖果人的诞生背景进行更详细的解释，最后的短片阐述了更深层的意义，被蜂群腐蚀的身体，钩子安上的手，糖果人是黑人群体被白人常年累月歧视的悲剧。
我的观影心态可能也正像看着那幅画欲言又止的他老婆。
存在这么一系列明显的“社科电影”，它们在影片中大声朗读出议题，并标记了一整套符号体系以凸显其主张——但它们偏偏是叙事性的；于是，故事成为元素，能量在积聚前就被指向，议题在丰富前就已固定，观众并不感受、并不观看，而仅是阅读。本片对中产社区生活的精致指向如同其所批判的内容一样虚伪：这只不过是另一立场的宣言，以及名为痛苦的痛苦
可以说没啥意思，浓浓的宗教风格，痴迷糖果人最后成为了糖果人，这样拍其实没必要
逃过了笔仙，筷仙，床仙，没逃过slander man，empty man，candy man。。。imdb分那么高，大概是因为zzzq吧
黑人种族歧视问题的意象化，密集恐惧的人体蜂巢，但是电影挺无聊的。
男主的皮肤到最后太恶心了，老子还正在吃饭，妈的……也不知道自己记的对不对，好像这个导演的片子/世界里只有黑人和白人，黄种人几乎不存在。这也是一种现实吧。
精致的室内装饰但没好好地利用这些空间优势，整体给我的感觉就是有足够的资金，但导演水平有限。
说实话，好像知道要表达什么，但是又不知道在讲什么
不是那么无聊，可能是我比较色，喜欢这种稍微带有一点色色的电影。
竟然是部恐怖片，很遗憾美式恐怖没怎么看懂！种族主义问题比较严重！导演太显摆，镜子正反摄影不错！
密集的孔洞 层叠的创伤 画笔与手的折损 探寻真相的女记者和当下评判艺术品价值的批评家 黄衣王在等待一个信奉历史正义的代言人 但白人的法理后置随行 语义的镜像对应灵活运用 意旨在告诉所有人 但是否是“说教式的 下意识的陈词滥调” 厕所蜜蜂照小镜子那个有意思
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
